Aha! Someone mentioned my name! That means Substack pings me. I will happily accept the prize of, “Not Bad Article” in the overall castigation, fellow guy I haven’t talked to or heard about before now. Thanks!
Good that you appreciated it enough to not rip into my little piece for the Junkers. I would mention though that while someone could take the foundational observation of The Path to Power - Being Useful (https://substack.com/home/post/p-185756229) in a purely Machiavellian way, I emphasized this immediately after:
“But make no mistake, you do not need to be an absolute cutthroat in order to gain significant sway or higher office in life than your peasant-abodes now. Everyone benefits from useful people”
Regardless of your guiding ethos, being useful to others gets you power. What you choose to do with that observation determines its moral weight. So, hopefully, good people will learn to employ that even better than the cutthroats!
Anyway, thanks for the mention. Even though it is a fairly hard critique overall of the Junkers group, I’m glad you felt engaged enough by the Substack to write your own piece regarding it and linked to the authors you were mentioning. More content for you, more coverage for them, more for our mutual audiences to contemplate. A win-win for all involved so far!
I read your article in turn, and though I think you may be extrapolating a bit too far into what is meant by “Junker” in Zach’s usage for his group, it is nonetheless good that you occupy yourself with pro-cultural and pro-health work. That’s great stuff! We may disagree on some things as anyone does, but overall I’m sure we’d agree on much more.
If you’d want to discuss the Substack group Junkers to test any of your notions about it out, feel free to chat with me. I can only speak on behalf of myself and my experience, but I think you’d like the initiative much more if you knew the talented people who make it up.
VERY encouraging to see other people noticing and calling out the shills and subversives!
Aha! Someone mentioned my name! That means Substack pings me. I will happily accept the prize of, “Not Bad Article” in the overall castigation, fellow guy I haven’t talked to or heard about before now. Thanks!
Good that you appreciated it enough to not rip into my little piece for the Junkers. I would mention though that while someone could take the foundational observation of The Path to Power - Being Useful (https://substack.com/home/post/p-185756229) in a purely Machiavellian way, I emphasized this immediately after:
“But make no mistake, you do not need to be an absolute cutthroat in order to gain significant sway or higher office in life than your peasant-abodes now. Everyone benefits from useful people”
Regardless of your guiding ethos, being useful to others gets you power. What you choose to do with that observation determines its moral weight. So, hopefully, good people will learn to employ that even better than the cutthroats!
Anyway, thanks for the mention. Even though it is a fairly hard critique overall of the Junkers group, I’m glad you felt engaged enough by the Substack to write your own piece regarding it and linked to the authors you were mentioning. More content for you, more coverage for them, more for our mutual audiences to contemplate. A win-win for all involved so far!
I read your article in turn, and though I think you may be extrapolating a bit too far into what is meant by “Junker” in Zach’s usage for his group, it is nonetheless good that you occupy yourself with pro-cultural and pro-health work. That’s great stuff! We may disagree on some things as anyone does, but overall I’m sure we’d agree on much more.
If you’d want to discuss the Substack group Junkers to test any of your notions about it out, feel free to chat with me. I can only speak on behalf of myself and my experience, but I think you’d like the initiative much more if you knew the talented people who make it up.
Two of the "talented" people are 1.) Spritually jewish and 2.) Actually jewish. So no, I won't like anything the Junkers put out.
If you don’t know who we are just look at the size of our BALLS- Capitan Mattioni - Arditti
“The majority of people that read Junkers will obviously think he is referring to Whites as junk.”
I thought he was referring to the manufacturer of the Stuka airplane.
There's that as well