Another Day in Conspiracy
I’ll keep this brief, as I’m just not the right guy for the subject of what would be called ‘conspiracies.’ I know full well that I’ve only happened to scratch the surface, and they’re not at all healthy for me, but that also allows me to try to give a different perspective on the subject that, for instance, can better suit noobs.
I also won’t get into the potential semantic issue of whether ‘conspiracies’ is the right word, and will just use it as is typical.
Conspiracies are probably what most darken or damn democracy. Their purpose is to better understand and clarify who’s doing what and why, and their appeal and potential importance is self-evident; who knows how you could be affected by being so profoundly left in the dark, especially in an age which can and has more greatly mastered subjects of basic psychology, advertising, consumerism, surveillance, etc.? It’s as if once you hear about them and are given a decent lead or line of argumentation for them, you have no excuse not to try to look into it further. Yet the difficulties in all this are just as daunting; you’re pretty much gambling with different potential ways to be deceived and influenced, using that of your own—or a more personal-seeming group—against that perceived in those in power.
Even still, the reality of plausibility can be confirmation all its own. In fact,
The Reality of Plausibility Can be Confirmation All Its Own
Here the American tastes of my generation will think of Epstein as rightfully as they will immediately. Whether Epstein was an Israeli honeypot and how much is or isn’t confirmed about Pizzagate, the Bohemian Grove, or the ‘QAnon zeitgeist’ at large—QAnon summarizes the sentiment of what’s currently in fashion among suspicion—the entire business of Epstein is itself a smoking gun. None of this happens period unless certain people aren’t actually crazy; if you have vices, and someone you know could be so easily overwhelmed or corrupted, what do those up in modernist fantasyland have?
Still, ‘abyss’ and all.
Speech Makes Noise
This one seems like something otherwise obvious yet easy to miss in the act of accruing insider/forbidden knowledge: if you talk about someone, they can hear you.
The inspirer of this post, , dropped such a bomb recently in his apparent (‘apparent’ because I frankly don’t have the time to go through all of the currently released files) discovery of a confirmation of 4chan creator Christopher Poole meeting and establishing rapport with the world’s least favorite Jeffrey.
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01992938.pdf
The Resulting Logical Problem
If there’s a big conspiracy, and you’re in the same general ‘game,’ how is your sphere not either actively under threat or already aversely influenced? For the far-right as it currently stands, this presents an impassible impossibility that would force absolute unity from a demographic that has only gotten where it is through absolute, indulgently vulgar defiance.
We find the new Epstein material either redundant or a confirmation of depressive realism. The conclusion is the same as yesterday: where a focus on politics among the Right is a fool’s errand due to internal deficiencies and external guarantees of subversivity all across the board, Christian churches remain the only option that can answer with any guarantees of potential; it can’t be argued that the Catholics and Orthodox have already been through worse.