Leftism in its Entirety
Rejecting traditional morality leads to the conceit that one can defy human limitations in favor of some utopic vision, explicit or implicit. What it feels like to have such a conceit is the absolute want to remove suffering, which is eliminated whenever possible in favor of its perceived opposite in maximal human elevation. (I.e., getting whatever you want, including the pretense that such is magically assured to go well.)
This motive is foundationally and thereby exclusively negative, as its first reality is that which you can’t stand to bear; leftism is an attempt to eliminate normal opposing forces, which can be anything from people to the “risk” of pregnancy curtailing whorishness. The conclusion of rejecting obedience to rules of the human experience that you can’t reconcile, or won’t1, is rejecting life itself, which isn’t affected by how the outward severity of said rejection varies from believer to believer.
The degrees of this that one can consciously feel in themselves range from rejecting your host culture—unanimous among them—to lamenting how being alive isn’t anything you can agree to or control.
Beyond attempted quibbles of the differences between different specific ideologies, the morphemic faith of leftism is only held through one of or a combination of the following three rewards:
Conceits of righteousness in their personalities and of objectivity in the assumptions of their institutions. These are normalized whenever possible, such as any ‘science’ that appears to lend credence toward one of their desired conclusions thereby somehow becoming invincible.
A preexisting refusal to quit a vice, pretension, or deficiency of personality.
Politicized psychological conditioning to take disobedience toward leftist views as harmful or their version of demonic.
Leftism’s absolution is triumphs and tomorrows that never arrive2. Its best people are those lucky enough for their dopamine sensors of arbitration to direct them to a decent life, which they fail by not directing others toward the same in what resembles a kind of comfortably slow rot. This is guaranteed by their failure to explain even themselves.
All of this results in the following:
Total antisociality. Anything one generation builds WILL be rejected by the next, only for the oldies to gawk at how “the Left left them” despite only being done to as they themselves did. (This is of course to say nothing for how in such a world, as many pressures as possible are levied against not obeying its trends and fetishes, such as in a religious vocation.)
In addition, I assume you know of how avoidantly, bitterly uncomfortable some people get whenever you live as a good example of a final human decision, such as ‘marrying young,’ having a large family, or not marrying or not having children. This maddening effect is of course not unique to leftists, but it’s an institution among them. Westerners who don’t accept God resort to making one out of some perceived moral, ethic, or virtue that in becoming their god is exaggerated to childishness, and about which they become hypersensitive or even obsessed because if they lose it, life itself is existentially lost. What results can resemble anything from religious paranoia a la ‘it’s the Devil, it’s the Devil!’ to the psychology of hoarders.
As such, the leftist living among others knows that anything and anyone whose poses a threat to this unviable firmament must be put down whenever possible, ignored in miserable resentment whenever necessary, and never treated fairly.
Hence their mongoloid impression that ‘us wanting to make more and more and more changes and take more and more and more do whatever we want to whoever our suicidal self-loathing points us to is normal, but you not wanting that is an act of aggression,’ alongside ‘all media that expresses opposing views is magically “propaganda” and mine is magically not,’ and how every political word they use is a deranged signal of either absolute-good or absolute-evil.
Youth fetishism. Leftists can’t handle being old news. Every “revolution” is made conservative when its successive generations—piddlingly few as those of a suicidal breed are—come out and replace it. The more they get what they want, the more the revolution becomes an effeminately socially-enforced police state as its formative attitude transfers from a movement to the conservation of its gains and enactment of its rule. Most misplacedly womanly is the inversion of prejudice. Not overcoming prejudice, obviously not, but its inversion; revenge. It results in believers being subhumans lacking any redeeming quality or limit to their impulse-control-free power trips, while treating the worst on earth as their precious little babies in what can literally only be explained as purposeful spite against those who commit the crime of being great, beautiful, competent, and successful.
This effeminacy is also expressed in conceits like virtue-signaling, performative rebellion, delusions of being ‘above it all’ while being so politicized that they treat their politics as self-evident reality against which a challenge causes a narcissistic wound, and prioritizing the appearances of things over their actual results.
A war against reality. Human nature has limits. Inequality is inevitable and ignoring the offensive is suicidal—at best. The want to remove suffering can’t accept that, so they take to endlessly contradictory and hypocritical delusions of tabula rasa, human perfectibility, and endless, endless artificial policies and ‘programs’ in what’s essentially a war against reality. An underrated example of the second item is the dumb stoner who thinks we should all just ‘unite’ by getting rid of institutions he doesn’t like without a single clue of how much of an establishment luxury belief that is.
A dogma consisting solely of contradictions and hypocrisy. Much of this has been captured in anti-leftist memes, which remain evergreen because such covers the entirety of this worldview: everything the other guy does is bad but it’s okay when you do it, rampant imposition of political capital groups over those they hate—in this case, White people—‘morality is subjective and if you don’t believe that you’re objectively wrong,’ ‘only women have a say on abortion—except the ones that think wrong—but you don’t need a uterus to BE a woman,’ etc., etc. Again, every single one of their beliefs is like this (you are encouraged to notice others).
A famous example is when one among them notices that someone they’re close to is about to pursue illiberal ideals of living, like a young woman converting to Catholicism or Orthodoxy and wanting to live accordingly, and being “concerned about it” because according to their magic canon, not living like themselves is purposeless at best and for women a death sentence. In each case where such ‘concern’ is voiced about the potential to “ruin your life,” the ‘concerned’ will have some flagrant flaw about themselves due to their beliefs, one greater than could be caused by Christianity, that you can respond to by briefly looking them up and down and asking, ‘What life?’With the above four, a greater degree of egregiousness than any ‘ideology’ it could’ve replaced. Transgressive behavior and the deification thereof is increasingly normalized as de facto requirements to survive. Active abuses of power and anything blowing up in their face can’t be acknowledged because accepting failure means the ‘optimism’ or “hope” is over. Special interests or ‘elites’ lose any need for introduction in their wickedness. Diagnosing and treating human problems like addiction and age-regression require invariably illiberal solutions and learning experiences, so out that goes. The founding bases for leftist movements keep on aging even as their indirect worshipers keep milking their trauma over and over, as with the plain superstition that the ghost of Adolf Hitler is omnipresent. All the while, a leftist at their most intelligent/perceptive can plainly see given information that suggests the failure of their policies, but their only redoubt is handwaving it with a ‘well, things will improve.’
No, they won’t. If Canada is anything to go by, leftism has no limit. There is no proverbial floor to reach and then turn around from, it gets worse and worse until its subspecies fully dies.
Nor is any of this complicated. It’s just ‘do whatever you want, unless freedom calls it wrong,’ the diseased, contradiction-riddled mongoloidism of the Devil that changed hands from Eve to Adam to the antediluvian mess to Sodom and Gomorrah to ‘Bacchus’ to the Goliards to the Hellfire Club to Aleister Crowley to anyone else who “answers to their own set of angels.” They’re always the same, they will always fail, and their lives can only gain value through some kind of redemption. Today’s progressivism can only persist as an increasingly insane God-protocol which both primarily exists on the internet and through the influence of the internet affects a great deal of real life.
Unless there’s something with the aforementioned ‘special interests’ that we as of now don’t fully understand.
Common examples include vice-rejecting behavioral standards, accepting various kinds of inequality as a sad fact of life, and the inescapability of religion—i.e., the inescapability of the need to obey a code that you don’t always like.