Introduction
The other day, a clothing company on Twitter, Southern Accents, had noticed that more and more Whites were coming to the realization that an ethnostate would be better than living amongst non-Whites. So in order to control the narrative, the company tried to claim that an ethnostate was a “Yankee trap.”
But what does that actually mean?
The “Good” Negroes and “Evil” Yankees
Don’t fall into the Yankee ethnostate trap.
The concept of an ethno-state doesn’t stem from Yankee culture. For thousands of years, all of our European ancestors lived in “ethno-states.” It might be hard for the person behind Southern Accents to understand, but what we are experiencing today isn’t historically normal nor should it be normalized.
While ethno-states aren’t uniquely “Yankee,” myself growing up in the Yankee ethnostate of Maine—specifically Aroostook County (96% White)—was absolutely sublime. There was no crime, no language barriers, plenty of farms and local communities that worked together. Life was beautiful and peaceful. I didn’t have to worry about my little sister getting her throat slit on a subway.
That was their thing, not ours. Lincoln spoke of this at length. The abolitionist movement itself started in Virginia in the 1770s, not bleeding Kansas with the murderer John Brown and his thugs.
Here Southern Accents attempts to tie the anti-slavery sentiment of Thomas Jefferson to the “absurdity” of an ethnostate using a reference to Lincoln’s 1854 Peoria Speech. However, Southern Accent forget that Jefferson wrote in his 1821 autobiography:
“Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people [negroes] are to be free. Nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government. Nature, habit, opinion has drawn indelible lines of distinction between them. It is still in our power to direct the process of emancipation and deportation peaceably and in such slow degree as that the evil will wear off insensibly, and their place be pari passu filled up by free white laborers. If, on the contrary, it is left to force itself on, human nature must shudder at the prospect held up.”
Even Jefferson, the deist, understood that we could not coexist with negroes.
The South has always been a multi-racial society. An Anglo culture and society to be sure, as all Western nations should be, but multi-racial nonetheless.
Southern Accents is technically correct when he states that the South has always been a multi-racial society. However, it was a society of White men and property (negroes). It was not a society of “equal” or “free” men until 1865. That’s 258 years after the Anglo-Southern culture was established with the founding of Jamestown, Virginia in 1607, where the South had a caste system. The South was segregated in some aspect for roughly 364 years… and in one generation it has become the least White region in our country. Meanwhile he’s writing a defense of letting things get worse while pridefully boasting that the best societies are Anglo in ethnicity, while blaming the Yankees. The irony.
There is so much source material backing up the claims not only of there being black Confederates, but also that when the Yankees came down, they treated both whites and blacks shamefully, and blacks specifically as a whole far worse than any slave owners did.
I don’t personally know any serious person who would claim that negroes weren’t part of the Confederacy. However, the point he seems to be making is that the relationships of yesteryear are far more important than the relationships of today. He’s essentially saying that ‘Southerners should pick the negroes of today over the Yankees of today because it’s what our Confederate ancestors would have done.’
He’s basically saying ‘Yankees are the bad guys,’ when in fact the Yankees were just better at protecting their own culture and people because they didn’t generationally internalize the regrettable brother war past the 19th century. Hence, the North is ethnically more homogenous and as a result suffers less. The whole crux of his argument so far is ‘don’t trust the Yankees,’ but the Northerners are related to you by blood and culture. We’re also not the ones disproportionately committing crimes against you.
For evidence of this claim, and actual source material, I would encourage you to check out “A South-side View of Slavery; Or, Three Months at the South, in 1854” by Nehemiah Adams, “When the Yankees Come” by Paul C. Graham, “Sacred Conviction: The South's Stand for Biblical Authority” by Joseph Jay, and “The Slave Narratives” themselves. These resources will paint you a picture of what the South looked like before, during, and after the war. What you will find is a Southern society in which whites and blacks lived in relative peace and harmony, and in many ways had more healthy race relations back then than we do today.
What he is omitting is that, in the South for 258 years the negroes were property. After the war the South was legally and ethnically dominated by Whites. So what happens when you take away the power scaling and begin to racially balance the scale. Erosion of culture, racial replacement, mass migration, subversion, brainwashing, increased crime, etc.
The South lived in peace and harmony because you could use political and cultural enforcement. Once that was gone, you lost your racial peace and harmony.
I do find it funny that he adds “and in many ways had more healthy race relations back then than we do today.” It’s almost as if his brain is trying to naturally make the connection to why that is and yet his jewish programming won’t let him.
The Yankee invasion was not an attack on whites. They were far “whiter” than us in terms of population percentages, even taking out the slave population. There were far more freed blacks in the South than there were up North. The Yankee invasion was an attack on our culture and way of life. It was an attack on the bulwark of Christendom and America as the Founders intended.
The whole point of his post is essentially to keep up the tired psyop that the Yankees are the plight of the Southern people, despite the fact that the Civil War ended 161 years ago. Like I was hinting at earlier, guys like this know that there is a deep seeded and internalized generational disdain for Yankees in the hearts of most Southerners. He knows that they are bitter that they lost the Civil War and so he tries to capitalize on it. And while it was a needless brother war, hyper-focusing on it isn’t going to stop your racial replacement in your own lands.
He also tries to claim that the Yankees invaded to attack the “bulwark of Christendom” but that’s clearly not true. It’s just more emotionally charged rhetoric to make you focus on all the wrong things while your descendants lose more and more of their chances of surviving what will kick off around 2040 when Whites become a minority in the U.S.
Realistic vs. Idealistic
After I critiqued him on Twitter for advocating against an ethnostate in the South, he posted that my sentiment was unrealistic.
Tell me, which is more realistic; deporting all blacks back to Africa and creating an ethnostate, or winning the culture war and beginning to take back what we’ve lost over the last 80+ years.
Out of the two options that he listed… deporting all blacks back to Africa and creating an ethnostate. Here’s why:
The Cambridge English Dictionary states that culture is defined as “the way of life, especially the general customs and beliefs, of a particular group of people at a particular time.”
“Particular” being the keyword.
In order to win a culture war, you must first unite the culture, but you cannot do that unless you unite completely.
For instance, the far-right of the early 20th century in Europe absolutely dominated the culture of their respective European nations. Why is that? Well, it’s because they were able to unite the people in regards to religion, politics, and most importantly through community action.
For example, the NSDAP adopted Positive Christianity to stop religious infighting between Christian denominations, they united all of the ethnic Germans, and they worked to uplift the forgotten and neglected ethnic German worker.
Because cultures are externally affected via contact between large groups of people, which may also produce—or inhibit—social shifts and changes in cultural practices, you cannot win a culture war without addressing the large group that affected those changes.
It’s also important to note that war or competition over resources may affect social dynamics (ex. non-Whites competing for the same jobs as Whites). Additionally, cultural ideas may transfer from one society to another, through diffusion or acculturation (Wigger culture).
So, if you really want to win the culture war, you first must unite the people in that culture and of that culture, entirely. Those who have a unique culture, albeit similar cultural elements, cannot unite because they are not the same.
I’m not interested in hypothetical utopias that don’t exist, I’m interested in winning in the real world, and the way I see it, it’s far more realistic for us to renormalize our heroes and traditions, and begin to win influence in local elections, etc, than it is to try and create some perfect society that will never exist on this side of heaven in the first place.
Utopias cannot exist because we live in a fallen world. The origin of “Utopia,” comes from Thomas More’s 1516 satire of the same name. The idea is a parody of itself and no one can create one, nor am I claiming to be able to.
If you want to win in the real world, then you do have to “renormalize” our heroes and traditions, but only if the heroes are moral people and the traditions work for the benefit of our people. While the Founding Father’s said good things from time to time, they ultimately failed when they created the government of our nation. However, we can learn from those mistakes and adapt. This isn’t the first time that our race has had to do so. Nothing is forever in this material world and we have had plenty of historical experience with that as a race.
Instead of pitching political solutions that are an impossibility, let’s start making progress. How can we do this?
A few examples:-State level bans on abortions
In the U.S., abortion is favored in 34 of the 50 states, with 15 being effectively split on the issue, and only Arkansas supporting the elimination of it. Of those that support abortion the two races with the highest approval are Asians at 73% and negroes at 71%. Meanwhile, only 58% of Whites support abortion.
If there are 26.8 million Asians in the U.S. and 73% of them support abortion, roughly 19.6 million Asians would support abortion. If there are 48 million negroes in the U.S. and 71% of them support abortion, roughly 34.1 million negroes would support abortion. If there are 65 million mixed race Hispanics in the U.S. and 56% of mixed race Hispanics support abortion, roughly 36.4 million mixed raced Hispanics would support abortion. This means that roughly 90.1 million non-Whites would support abortion.
If there are 196 million Whites in the US and only 58% of them support abortion, this would mean roughly 113.7 million Whites support abortion. As of today, Whites are a majority in this country (56% of the population). However, by 2040 we will be a minority and our population total is set to decrease.
To put that into perspective, these are the projected non-White populations for 2040:
Mixed race Hispanics — 82 million
Asians — 45 million
Negroes — 60 million
Meaning we could see 45.92 million mixed race Hispanics, 32.85 million Asians, and 42.6 million negroes—with a grand total of 121.37 million non-Whites—supporting abortion. Meanwhile White support of abortion would drop somewhere below 110 million people.
If you haven’t caught on, what I am saying is that you aren’t going to convince the majority of the country to stop supporting abortion in 14 years. However, if you focused on one group… say Whites… we could effect a dramatic change in a generation or two because we will be persecuted and abortion will become less culturally valued.
-Complete elimination of state and federal welfare
If we were to combine all of the major welfare programs—Medicaid/CHIP, SNAP (food stamps), TANF (cash assistance), Housing assistance and SSI—into one general calculation, you would see the following racial breakdown:
Whites - ~45% or ~60 million are recipients.
Negroes - ~35% or ~21 million are recipients.
Mixed race Hispanics - ~30% or ~23 million are recipients.
Asians - ~25% or ~7 million are recipients.
This means that 60 million Whites use welfare, meanwhile 51 million non-Whites use welfare. If this data was taken and applied to the projected racial population breakdown in 2040, we should see ~57 million Whites use welfare and ~67 million non-Whites use welfare.
To clarify, Whites pay the most in taxes out of all the races and that trend would continue after 2040. We would essentially be paying to support our own replacement and genocide.
So how do you stop paying into welfare? Collectivizing in areas and refusing to pay taxes… If you do that in enough places, you’ll see the politicians come to the table. However, don’t trust them.
-Fast and swift trials and executions for first offense rape, murder, incest, and repeated reprobates
Depending on your race, trials can be extremely swift. It just so happens that it isn’t swift for White people. Take Karmelo Anthony for example. He murders Austin Metcalf and then later his family is able to use $430K from his legal fund to buy a brand new house. The only reason why Karmelo actually saw justice was because so many Whites pressured the media and the government to take action. That took all the collective pressure that we could muster under our current regime.
Now what if I told you that there are reportedly 600 Whites killed by negroes every year. That means there are nearly two victims like Austin Metcalf every single day. And that’s just the ones that are reported. Do you think we could muster the same collective pressure for a new victim every single day like we did for Austin Metcalf? Impossible. But you know what would be easier? Keeping negroes out of our neighborhoods and communities. You want to see crime plummet and trials move quicker… get rid of the negroes.
Did you know according to the 2008 U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Victimization in the United States Statistic Table, that negroes rape their own roughly 2x as much as Whites rape their own? Yet interracially, cases of Whites raping Negroes are statistically non-existent. Did you know that every 27 minutes, a White woman is raped by a negro?
What about incest? Well, negroes as 2x as likely to commit incest than Whites are. Non-Whites are also far more likely to molest children… among other crimes.
It seems pretty simple to me. If we wanted to begin to really tackle the high rates of crime, then we should begin excluding non-Whites from our spaces…
-Deportations of the low hanging fruit who have less standing in our society and are politically realistic (Somalis, Indians, Muslims, etc)
We’re never going to be able to deport the “low hanging fruit” in this political system because they are allowed to participate in our government and society. In fact, they have preference in our society and government. If you really want to tackle the politically realistic, then you better start building your tribe and getting ready for the “Electric Boogaloo.”
-Slowly reversing various unconstitutional amendments and other laws as we’re able to (Hart Cellar, Obergefell, one vote per property owning household, etc)
The Constitution is a piece of paper. Ultimately, it doesn’t mean anything because it no longer represents the ideals of the people it was created for. In fact, the people it was created by and for are going extinct. There might be some good things in there, but ultimately they have failed to protect us from the onslaught of treachery that our people have experienced in the last few generations.
However, in contrast the Bible is not a “living document,” it is an eternal collection of teachings. So if you want to actually change anything for your people, Luke 22:36.
If you’re expecting to vote harder and overturn things like Hart-Celler and Obergefell, then consider the fact that any person who shows up in our country and has a kid has a claim to our land and legacy. As long as we hold on to the idea of saving the American Republic, we will lose.
-Win the birthrate battle
The fertility rate for Whites has increased slightly in the past couple of years, but it is still lower than the birth replacement rate. If you want to increase the birthrates, then you will need to focus on a community level to culturally enforce monogamy and incentivize White people have children.
If you have noticed so far, he has not explained how we would do any of this, but like all mouthpieces he has only told us what he thinks we want to hear. There is no plan that they can come up with other than ‘vote harder and trust the plan.’
-Above all, return to our Christian roots
If we want to win, actually win, this is an example of a solution, but running around calling for the most extreme measures possible that normies aren’t gonna go with anyway isn’t a way forward as I see it.
According to him we need to ban state level abortions, eliminate state and federal welfare, make fast and swift trials while promoting the death penalty for heinous crimes, deport all the illegal invaders, reverse any unconstitutional amendments, drastically change the deficit birthrates, and then return to our Christian roots.
But how are we to accomplish all of that when it’s clear that the Republican experiment failed for us. We’re now second-class citizens in our country, we are being replaced in real time by non-Whites, we are being transgressed by non-Whites, we are being killed by non-Whites, we are subservient to non-Whites so long as we pretend that we can turn this experiment around. Just vote harder and trust in the system. Do as your ancestors did. That is definitely applicable to the events we are facing today… (famous Yankee sarcasm).
My measures might seem extreme, but that’s only because you’re refusing to open your eyes to history and to the spiritual war happening around us. As time goes on, more and more “normies” will start to see what I am talking about.
But I am not surprised someone who is preoccupied with selling clothes by virtue signaling to brainwashed people doesn’t see it as a way forward. You’re not building anything for your people, only for yourself. You’re not outside the political system watching all the fail-safes fail. You’re not looking for all of the news stories that the media is hiding about non-White on White crime. And you’re certainly not building anything productive.
If you really want to turn things around for our people, start tribing up locally and racially. Keep our Lord close to your heart and mind. Purify your soul, but make no mistake, we are headed for war and there is no avoiding it.
yankees still keep their kids segregated cuz a friend married one and they were all asking how it was going to school with negros cuz they don’t send their kids to school with them but we’re the bad ones when they have done more evil shit and destroying our Republic then any enemies could have dreamed