THE TIME TO UNIFY IS NOW!
It's time for a National Socialist Substack.
It wasn’t long ago that there were only a few openly National Socialist publications and writers on Substack. I remember 𝙂𝙊𝙊𝘿 𝘾𝙄𝙏𝙄𝙕𝙀𝙉 and White Rabbit were among some of the few. Sure, there were plenty of “Alt-Right” grifters and gatekeepers such as Walt Bismarck, and more Jews than one could possibly even name. But things are completely different now.
I have been entirely focused for the past year on Twitter audience capture. Which was widely successful endeavor, as I was able to make the largest National Socialist community on Twitter. However, the inevitable happened and Twitter decided that they had enough of us and banned the community of over 5.7k members.
Twitter is practically dead. The most prominent National Socialists have been banned, beside the obvious grifters and gatekeepers. So attention must turn to a different platform that offers much more hope.
When I first joined Substack it was the same old tired and deceptive fight of LEFT VS. RIGHT. In reality, it was all political bread and circuses. Now, the story is completely different. I am running into National Socialists all the time. The caveat is that they are usually writing into the void. They may have something to say, but they can’t reach an audience because they simply cannot beat the algorithm. Another realization that I have come across is the fact that many of the so-called “National Socialists” or “Fascists” are complete degenerates. In the case of Zoran Zoltanous, one of the most prominent “Fascist” writers, he’s actually a race-mixing pedophile.
The key issue that we have is that there is a fragmentation amongst the National Socialists when we should be working to unify. As an Orthodox Christian and leader of one of the largest National Socialist orgs in the United States, the New Way, I don’t believe that we should unify no matter what. That implies that we throw out the fabric of our society in order to gain strength in numbers. If you want to see how that works out in real time, all you have to do is look at the Republican party. This is the same party that once stood against gay marriage and now openly embraces it for numbers. Umbrellas are meant to stop the rain from getting the user wet, but an umbrella can’t do its intended purpose if there holes in it.
Why This Is Necessary
If we remain fragmented as we are, we will surely die off as a movement. God gifted us a golden opportunity, but only if we reach out and take it. We can’t idly watch as these things pass us by. That also means that some of us will need to make sacrifices in order to do what is best for society, our nation, our race, and our God.
The algorithm is not favorable to National Socialists, Fascists, or the Far-Right. This platform is owned by a Jew, a Progressive, and a Pajeet after all. What we need to do is form under one large publication that is legally airtight so they cannot take us down. Otherwise, come 2028, they will ban us in favor of those who support a milk-toast race mixing candidate like J.D. Vance. It’s not even a theory, it’s an inevitability. At some point they will completely take away our voices because we are so fragmented.
If we were unified, well that would change everything. We would have a great chance of survival and we could pool resources together to fight any suspension or algorithmic problem. We could highlight the best minds in our movement and push the agenda as we see fit. We could get into the leader boards of Substack and get even more people to read our work. The sky is the limit.
Independent publications thrive on conviction—but fragmentation limits impact. Dozens of aligned voices operating separately face the same pressures: platform risk, audience churn, payment uncertainty, and time constraints that pull focus away from writing itself. But what if we could eliminate all of those. Having one publication with as many writers as possible does the following:
Increases searchability and reach
Allows writers to write on their time and still gain an audience
Writers can focus on their craft while administrators in the background ensure they are being compensated fairly and that the publication runs smoothly.
This isn’t me telling you to join Arditi because we’re better than you, I’m telling you to join us because we believe in you and we don’t want our people to go extinct.
Christian National Socialists Lead the Way
The majority of Whites (Aryans) are Christian and that will not change. History shows us that when Christians are pushed to the brink, they will overcome the odds. We did it in the Iberian Peninsula, we did it with the Ottoman Turks, we did it with the Soviets, and we will keep doing it. We are the natural leaders of this movement. We have the numbers amongst Aryans, we have the history, and we have the conviction to overcome. And this is why I brought up holes in the umbrella. We don’t need to allow subversive voices into our sphere just because they believe some of the things that we do or identify with us. We are the National Socialists.
We are also the most heavily censored on social media. Some of the biggest “Far-right” voices on this platform and in the broader movement are not Christian. Why is that? Is it because most people are pagan? Well we know that’s not the case. SO WHY IS THIS SO?
The simple answer is that it is incredibly important for the Jews to highlight the fringes of our movement in the hopes that more people will either identify with them, which will take away our chances of unity, or associate them with the whole movement and thus decide not to associate with us. It’s a strategic tactic that has worked for them for over 100 years. Now is the time to flip the table.
Arditi exists to preserve and advance work that is often marginalized, de-platformed, or made economically unsustainable elsewhere—without editorial softening or ideological compromise.
We’re not here to make money off of your work, we’re here to save our race.
Why Merging Beats Staying Independent
Audience Amplification
Merging publications clearly makes the most amount of sense. You get a larger subscriber base, you get more cross-promotion to new audiences, and readers discover your back-catalog content. One archive, one funnel, many voices.
Revenue Stability
The overwhelming majority of writers on Substack never see a dollar. But what if you could make money for your craft? Even if you’re not out to make money and you’re just writing for the love of the game like I was, it doesn’t hurt to have a little more spending money.
If every National Socialist joined Arditi as a writer, then we could pool subscriptions and we all could be uplifted. Imagine revenue shares per author or section of the publication. This also would lower the individual payment processor exposure and allow us to keep more of what we earn. Fewer payment failures. More predictable income. It’s a win-win.
Infrastructure Offload
Arditi is already an established publication and we have a well regarded physical magazine with paid sponsors such as Third Reich Books and Above Time Coffee Roasters. We can handle the logistics, we can handle the formatting, archiving, tagging, legal and copyright structure to preserve your work, and we can handle managing Substack as well. All you would need to do is write to the best of your ability when you want. Less time worrying about the little things and more time spent doing what you love.
What Writers Keep
The biggest hesitation that writers will have with this is the worry that we’re going to become a dead behind the eyes corporation like all the others. Fortunately, I’m not a Jew, so I’m not going to sell you out. I’m not in this for money, or power, or glory. I’m not here to tell you that you can’t publish something or get involved with your artistic vision. Here’s what you get when you join Arditi:
Full authorship credit on all of your work and the full rights to take it wherever you want.
You get to keep your name, your voice, and your vision.
We will catalog your full archive for new readers to enjoy and we will make a promise that we will not delete or change your archived work.
Each article that you write will have a clear attribution and we will create author pages to highlight those that join us.
We will also include exit clauses that are favorable:
Subscriber Portability Clause
Subscribers acquired before the merger belong to the writer
Subscribers acquired through the merged publication remain with Arditi
No-Fault Exit Clause
Either party may terminate participation without cause upon thirty (30) days written notice.
Archive Reversion Clause
Upon exit, the writer may request removal or continued archival hosting of their contributed works, with full authorship attribution retained in either case.
Revenue Finalization Clause
All outstanding revenue shares will be calculated and disbursed within thirty (30) days of termination, with no future claims on earnings generated after the exit date.
Non-Disparagement
Both Arditi and the writer will agree to not disparage the other for 12 months in regards to false or malicious statements.
Brand & Name Reversion Clause
If a writer brought a brand in, they should leave with it. That means your name, logo, and trademarks revert back to you 100%. Arditi will not continue use without your permission.
Platform Migration Clause
If you want to migrate to another platform other than Substack, we would be more than willing to accept that.
Merging does not erase authorship. It consolidates infrastructure. Writers maintain their identity, voice, and credit while benefiting from collective reach and protection.
Risk Mitigation & Platform Defense
As National Socialists, especially ones with a smaller following, Substack writers are terrified of bans, demonetization, and payment processor shutdowns. And this is exactly where Arditi comes into play.
Not only do we have the means to set up our own newsletter service, host our own website, and protect us from censorship, we can also spread your work on other social media sites more effectively than any single one writer can. Together we can create a unified response to Substack trying to pressure us.
Arditi isn’t just a broadcasting station for your work, it’s a broadcast station in a fortress.
Not a Network, a Library
Arditi is not a temporary network to boost subscribers in the short term. We’re not a content farm or influencer network. We are a living archive designed to outlast platforms. Where ever we go, the library follows. Because the most important part of all of this is preserving our people’s work and continuing our traditions. Allowing our people long-term access even after the writers are gone.
What’s the Structure Model?
My proposal is collaborative, not acquisitional. Arditi offers not just one type of structure model, but three. So you can choose the best model for you.
Section-Based Integration
With section-based integration (or a federate collective), Arditi becomes the parent publication, and each writer/publication becomes a dedicated section. This means shared homepages and subscriptions for a larger audience, individual bylines and landing pages for your section, and a shared infrastructure that allows you to keep your own editorial voice.
Think of this as a federal system, not a hierarchy, allowing you to amplify your voice without surrendering your identity.
Writers control their own section content while Arditi controls the platform standards, legal compliance, and subscription mechanics. This also means no cross-editing unless the writer specifically requests it.
When it comes to revenue, we can offer a flat revenue share per section (e.g. % of monthly net) or a base stipend with a performance-based share (reads, opens, or subscriber attribution). Even if our audience overlaps ideologically, they might not stylistically. This gives the writer more options in terms of compensation.
When it comes to subscriber ownership, the writer/publication retains all pre-merger subscribers while new subscribers stay with Arditi. This also means that your subscribers control who they subscribe to.
When you choose the section-based integration, you get a clean exit that allows you to remove your section or archive it with minimal disruption to Arditi.
Section-based integration is low risk, high trust, and it allows us to scale everything horizontally with easy onboarding.
Archive Migration + Contributor Role
With this model, you can have your legacy content migrated to Arditi and archived, while allowing you to publish new content under a contributor agreement. This model is best for dormant newsletters, banned authors, or writers who want permanence beyond weekly publishing.
Writers interested in this model will migrate their existing archive to Arditi and the content will be organized chronologically. New content is published through Arditi with the writer attributed as a contributor, not a section owner.
Arditi acts as an archive or even a library for your previous work to give you institutional memory. That way your body of work will not be lost to time.
If you choose this model, Arditi will control the structure and presentation of your article, without controlling your voice. Nor will we add or remove anything that is counter to what you are writing. The only thing we will do is fix any spelling or grammatical mistakes. Everything else is all your words and thoughts.
When it comes to revenue, we want to offer you one of the following:
one-time migration stipend
ongoing contributor revenue share
or no direct revenue
instead we can focus on promotional value + preservation for those not comfortable taking money.
With this model, we would still allow you to retains all pre-merger subscribers while new subscribers stay with Arditi. Exiting Arditi under this model is still extremely easy. You control what content you get to remove. So you can decide to leave some of the content archived with Arditi with full attribution.
This model allows us to build up the depth of Arditi’s content, the depth of your reach, and the legitimacy of your writing. This model is ideal for censored or “unhostable” content that could easily be flagged in the algorithm.
Full Brand Absorption
If you’re finding that you have less and less time to dedicate to writing, to the point where your publication is become inactive or dormant, we are more than willing to fully absorb your publication and be your publisher. This means your subscribers stay active and your writing isn’t forgotten. If you’re a small or stalled publication that wants to survive the Substack algorithm, but you can’t scale your publication independently, that’s where we come in.
The incoming publication ceases independent operations and the brand is completely folded into Arditi. Then your content is reissued or integrated under Arditi’s masthead. Writers will then become part of Arditi’s staff, an editor, or a named contributor. This is the traditional publisher relationship that other well established publishers offer. However, this time the offer is from one of your own.
Arditi will have all final editorial authority while allowing the writers to retain their voice under our house standards. This also gives a stronger, more coherent, and unified tone to our articles.
Revenue is offered as an agreed upon salary with performance bonuses.
Subscribers will also belong to Arditi, although former subscribers are encouraged to migrate should the writer and Arditi part ways. This allows for a clean break for future work and for your legacy to stay relevant with Arditi. This also offers the maximum amount of clarity, with a strong brand consolidation, and easier legal and financial management.
No Pressure
Authors or publications interested in exploring section-based integration are invited to initiate a private discussion. These conversations focus on editorial alignment, section structure, audience overlap, revenue participation, and exit-friendly terms before any decision is made. Participation begins deliberately and without public commitment. The objective is durability and coherence, not rapid consolidation.
Archive migration prioritizes continuity over cadence. Contributors may publish occasionally or remain dormant while their work is preserved, contextualized, and maintained within a stable institutional archive. Authors who believe their work belongs in a permanent, curated home are invited to confidential conversations regarding scope, attribution, licensing, and exit terms. These discussions are exploratory and non-binding, and begin with a review of the archive itself—not performance metrics. This is not a growth program. It is a custodial arrangement intended to outlast platforms.
Full brand absorption is reserved for publications that no longer wish to operate independently and are seeking continuity, operational relief, and long-term survival within a larger publishing structure. This arrangement requires a high level of alignment and trust and is pursued selectively. Conversations begin privately and focus on brand history, archive disposition, contributor roles, and long-term editorial direction before any public transition occurs. This is a publishing decision, not a collaboration. It is appropriate only where consolidation serves both continuity and coherence.
Whatever decision you decide, we invite you to discuss this with us privately so there’s no public commitment and we can answer all of your questions at your convenience.
If this is something that interests you, please reach out to either myself or Arditi’s Editor, Leon .
Send Leon a message on his profile: https://substack.com/@natsoctoday1?utm_source=global-search
Send me a message on my profile: https://substack.com/@ardito1
Feel free to leave a comment below.
Not a Nat-Soc, but I’m willing to lay aside differences in the face of the Deep State Zogmachine. Good post. 👍
Love this article! I think also Vlad the Impailer had some to do with the Ottomans too lol.. I betcha he was the good guy eh?