Why Roman Catholicism & American Nationalism Can’t Coexist
Chronological Indictment of Doctrinal Reversal, Ecclesiastical Hegemony, and Fraternal Hypocrisy:
The history of Christendom reveals that no institution has repeatedly demonstrated unilateral doctrinal innovation and the assertion of centralized power more than the Roman Catholic Church. From the perspective of American values—rooted in liberty, accountability, and fidelity to principle—Rome’s record appears as a systematic betrayal of its closest Christian brethren, the Orthodox Church.
The history of Christendom reveals that no institution has repeatedly demonstrated unilateral doctrinal innovation and the assertion of centralized power more than the Roman Catholic Church. From the perspective of American values—rooted in liberty, accountability, and fidelity to principle—Rome’s record appears as a systematic betrayal of its closest Christian brethren, the Orthodox Church.
This self-disclosure has now been confirmed not merely by historical evidence, but by Rome itself. In a June 13, 2024 press conference of the Dicastery for Promoting Christian Unity concerning The Bishop of Rome: Primacy and Synodality, the Vatican acknowledged that the current model of papal supremacy is “the pyramidal Church, so {{set up since the Gregorian Reformation}},” in which “{{the Bishop of Rome is the apex of the hierarchical pyramid, the Supreme Pontiff who governs not only the Church of Rome, but the universal Church with proper, full and universal power.}}”
Rome openly admits that this structure is not apostolic, but the result of the 11th-century Gregorian reforms. This is a direct acknowledgment that the first millennium of the Church did not recognize any universal papal monarchy, but only primacy of honor within a conciliar framework shared among the patriarchal sees. The change from conciliar equality to monarchical supremacy was structural and doctrinal, replacing the governance of bishops in council with a single juridical sovereign claiming universal jurisdiction. The Vatican’s own statement confirms that papal supremacy is a medieval innovation—precisely the position the Orthodox Church has maintained from the beginning: Rome departed from the original apostolic order and re-engineered the Church into a centralized power pyramid foreign to the Fathers.
The first major rupture from the ancient system emerged in the addition of the Filioque clause to the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed. By inserting “and the Son” into the Creed without conciliar consent, Rome altered Trinitarian doctrine and broke canonical order. This marked a decisive shift: Rome now asserted for itself not only primacy, but unilateral authority over universal faith and doctrine. The schism of 1054 formalized this reality, when Rome excommunicated the East on the false premise that it retained universal jurisdiction to do so without an ecumenical council. The Eastern response merely mirrored the act; Rome’s presumption created the divide.
The Fourth Crusade in 1204 demonstrated the consequences of this usurpation. Under the direction and blessing of the Papacy, Crusaders sacked Constantinople, desecrated churches, and slaughtered Orthodox Christians. The Papacy then replaced the legitimate Orthodox Patriarchate with a Latin hierarchy, revealing that unity for Rome meant not brotherhood, but domination. Forced conversions, liturgical coercion, and inquisitorial pressures followed for centuries.
Rome’s diplomacy repeatedly prioritized political expediency over Christian solidarity. While Orthodox Christians suffered under Islamic conquest, Rome launched alliances with Muslim powers and later adopted
theological accommodations that contradicted earlier papal condemnations. The Council of Florence in 1439 forced a false union upon the East under threat of geopolitical annihilation, but the East rejected it through the steadfast witness of St. Mark of Ephesus. When Constantinople fell in 1453, Rome’s failure to defend the city confirmed its strategic priorities lay not with defending Christendom, but with preserving and advancing its own institutional interests. The creation of Eastern Catholic Uniate structures institutionalized internal subversion by enticing or coercing Orthodox populations to accept papal supremacy while retaining outward forms of their tradition. This process fractured communities and created centuries of bitterness and instability. Meanwhile, Rome’s silence in the face of genocides against Orthodox Christians in the Ottoman and Soviet eras further demonstrated its unwillingness to defend those outside submission to papal rule.
Modern developments, including the Lateran Treaty, the ecumenical diplomacy of Vatican II, and the canonization of popes who advanced doctrinal and liturgical novelty, reveal a continuous trajectory: Rome evolves its doctrines and allegiances in accordance with political and institutional interests rather than fidelity to the apostolic deposit. The Vatican II affirmation that non-Christian religions participate in salvific truth stands in contrast to Rome’s continued insistence that the Orthodox must submit to papal supremacy before reunion can occur. This reveals not a pursuit of unity, but the maintenance of ecclesiastical hegemony.
The cumulative record demonstrates a consistent pattern of doctrinal innovation, fraternal betrayal, and institutional self-preservation. True reconciliation demands the restoration of the apostolic and conciliar order that characterized the first millennium—a reality the Vatican has now acknowledged once existed and was later replaced. Until Rome repents of its medieval reconstruction of the Church, renounces unilateral supremacy, and returns to conciliar accountability, unity remains impossible. From both an American and an Orthodox perspective, genuine brotherhood requires shared governance, integrity of tradition, and fidelity to the truth—not submission to a man-centered hierarchy justified by the ambitions of the Gregorian Revolution.
Important Announcements
Saturday Blockbuster!
The New Way in conjunction with Fifth Column Library is screening films relevant to our struggle each Saturday night at 8 pm EST.
This week we will be featuring two documentaries on Auschwitz:
David Cole’s “David Cole Interviews Dr. Franciszek Piper”
& “Auschwitz: The Surprising Hidden Truth”
White Power


The definitive edition of White Power by George Lincoln Rockwell has just been published by Fifth Column Library.
Here’s why this new edition was needed:
The official version from Rockwell’s own party was poorly formatted.
There was a ton of missing context.
It was clearly edited to add bias or reference events that took place after Rockwell was killed.
So of we fixed those issues.
Our new edition includes:
Clean, readable typesetting
Restored original text
Fair historical context
An updated forward
Over 40 pages of endnotes
Brand new cover art
Hyperlinks for easy navigation (PDF only)
6”x9” Hardcover and Paperback options
The new edition is available now:





The RCC kept the jew in the ghetto for almost 2 millenia…… only when man turned from God in the 1700’s were the jews released from the ghetto…. look at us now!!
I’m (for now at least) an American Protestant and I’ve considered both Catholicism and Orthodoxy. What keeps me from Catholicism is similar to what you’ve laid out: I’m not convinced the Papacy has the authority it claims, and I think it would be very dangerous to commit myself and my family to holding that a fallible authority is infallible on matters so important as faith and morals.
The Eastern Orthodox model seems to me a lot closer to the early church, and I would have a much easier time accepting the church’s laws as valid. The issue I can’t shake though, is that I am a western man. My ancestors as far back as can be traced are all Catholic or Protestant. Eastern Orthodoxy is a beautiful tradition, but it is not my tradition, and I feel that I would be LARPing to some degree if I became Eastern Orthodox. Any advice?